Invite reproduction
Invite reproduction is currently marked good. Keep the work that supports this moving.
The report separates lagging outcomes from leading signals so a chart always says whether the movement is good, bad, mixed, or not enough data.
The scoreboard. These tell us whether COPY is becoming a repeat behavior, not just a thing people try once.
Conversations people came back to, not just tried once.
Means: active conversations in the last 28 days that also had voice activity before this 28-day window divided by all active conversations in the last 28 days. Window: May 22, 2026 12:00 AM to Jun 18, 2026, 8:18 PM MST.
Read: Needs focus: Repeat conversations is moving the wrong way (down 10 percentage points vs comparison).
Shows whether new device identities keep finding value after the novelty window.
Means: device identities in a signup cohort that were message-active four weeks after registration divided by device identities in the same signup cohort. Window: mature signup cohorts only; newer cohorts show a dash until enough time has passed. Message-active means sent, played, or acknowledged a message.
Read: Watch: Week-4 message-active retention is roughly steady or not decisive (down 1 percentage points vs comparison).
Conversations are more valuable when another person actually joins in.
Means: active conversations where at least two device identities sent, played, or acknowledged a message divided by all active conversations in the last 28 days. Window: May 22, 2026 12:00 AM to Jun 18, 2026, 8:18 PM MST. This means two people participated; it does not necessarily mean both people sent messages back and forth.
Read: Watch: 2+ people participated is roughly steady or not decisive (down 4 percentage points vs comparison).
Measures whether accepted invitees later create their own invite within 24 hours.
Means: accepted invite identities that created another invite within 24 hours divided by accepted invite identities in the last 28 days. Window: May 22, 2026 12:00 AM to Jun 18, 2026, 8:18 PM MST. This is anonymized identity-prefix behavior, not a person-level social graph.
Read: Good: Invite reproduction is moving in the right direction (up 27 percentage points vs comparison).
The levers. These are earlier behaviors we can improve now and test against the scoreboard later.
Early channel creation is the first sign that setup turned into intent.
Means: new registered device identities that started a conversation within 24 hours of registration divided by new registered device identities in the last 28 days. Window: May 22, 2026 12:00 AM to Jun 18, 2026, 8:18 PM MST.
Read: Good: First conversation within 24h is moving in the right direction (up 9 percentage points vs comparison).
A channel starts to matter when another person gets in.
Means: accepted invites divided by created invites. Window: May 22, 2026 12:00 AM to Jun 18, 2026, 8:18 PM MST.
Read: Good: Invite acceptance rate is moving in the right direction (up 23 percentage points vs comparison).
Playback is the first evidence that voice reached the other side.
Means: new registered device identities that reached the first-message-received milestone divided by new registered device identities in the last 28 days. Window: May 22, 2026 12:00 AM to Jun 18, 2026, 8:18 PM MST. This is a milestone proxy for first playback, not a complete message-by-message play rate.
Read: Good: First playback milestone is moving in the right direction (up 9 percentage points vs comparison).
The strongest hunch for a durable conversation is another person participating.
Means: active conversations where at least two device identities sent, played, or acknowledged a message divided by all active conversations in the last 28 days. Window: May 22, 2026 12:00 AM to Jun 18, 2026, 8:18 PM MST. This is participation, not a strict back-and-forth sender count.
Read: Watch: Second person participated is roughly steady or not decisive (down 4 percentage points vs comparison).
Weekly conversation activity. Default is 90 days; use shorter views to inspect recent movement.
Percent of each signup cohort that was message-active in later weeks. A dash means that week has not happened yet.
| Signup week | W0 | W1 | W2 | W4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8-May 14 30 | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| May 15-May 21 11 | 9% | 0% | 0% | - |
| May 22-May 28 55 | 44% | 2% | 2% | - |
| May 29-Jun 4 76 | 49% | 17% | - | - |
| Jun 5-Jun 11 53 | 36% | - | - | - |
| Jun 12-Jun 18 30 | - | - | - | - |
These are beliefs we are testing, not facts we should overstate.
| Hypothesis | Rationale | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Groups retain better | Group channels create more chances for repeat voice use. | 15% of sends are in group conversations. | Mixed |
| Fast social activation matters | Channels become useful when another person joins quickly. | 23% invite acceptance rate in the last 28 days. | Supported |
| Second participant predicts return | A conversation with two participating people is more likely to become repeat use. | 85% of active conversations had 2+ people participate. | Mixed |
| Playback closes activation | A sent voice note matters more when someone hears it. | 30% first playback milestone rate. | Supported |
Three practical reads from the current data. These are meant to guide product attention, not to be public copy.
Invite reproduction is currently marked good. Keep the work that supports this moving.
Repeat conversations is the clearest improvement area. Treat it as this week's product question.
Second person participated is watch. Watch it, but do not make it the whole story yet.
Definitions used throughout this page. Counts are anonymized device or channel signals, not named people.
Recommendation: keep this public URL as the rolling live read. Use GitHub artifacts and Cloudflare deployment history as the automatic audit trail, and only promote durable monthly or decision-point snapshots when a specific narrative needs to be preserved.